Care Homes Review
11th
March 2010
Aberdeenshire UNISON's
RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION ON CHANGES TO ROTA AND WORKING PRACTICE
IN CARE HOMES
 |
"Some staff are "losing"
up to 20% of their income due to the "removal" of shift allowance"
Inez Teece, Assistant Secretary |
Inez Teece, Assistant Secretary has compiled this response using
information gathered from the Consultation meetings held around
Aberdeenshire and feedback from individuals.
Inez said, "Any change to working practice and patterns
causes great concerns and anxiety. Care Homes are staffed predominantly
by a female workforce that care deeply for their residents home
and communities, but also have home and family lives that are
equally important to them. These proposed changes have unsettled
our members and concerns for themselves and their livelihoods
are now forefront in their minds."
Shift Allowance
Generally there is a comment coming from all homes about shift
allowance. Staff are concerned about the apparent removal of shift
allowance for the majority of "day" staff. Staff feel that there
has been a deliberate removal of shift allowance. Staff are raising
concerns that all but "full time" staff will no longer be eligible
for the shift allowance, creating a perceived discrimination against
part time women workers. Staff are concerned about working alongside
colleagues doing the same job on different pay. Staff feel that
rotas have been deliberately drawn up to ensure part time staff
do not receive shift allowance.
top
Weekend Working
Some of the Care Homes currently operate on a one weekend off,
one weekend working rota. The proposal is to change all homes
to a 3 or 6 week rota, meaning that staff will work 2 weekends
out of 3. Staff are expressing concerns about this as it impacts
on staff home lives, as often partners work on a Monday to Friday
basis and school children are home at weekends.
Concerns were raised as to staffing levels because of this change
as they believe there would be too many staff working at weekends
and not enough working during the week when it can often be busier.
The question was raised by some Homes "why fix something that
is not broken?", why change now when it works at the moment and
meets the criteria for staffing?
The costs of more staff working at the weekend were also raised
as a concern, as weekend working allowance would apply. Concerns
were also voiced by staff that they thought that sickness absence
would increase at weekends as staff would be stressed by the impact
on their home lives and they believe a very few would take the
opportunity to use sickness as a way to spend time with their
families.
The length of consecutive days worked was also raised as a concern
on a health and safety viewpoint. Staff were concerned that in
order to get the weekend off, they would have to work up to 8
days consecutively.
Other concerns were raised that in order to reduce the number
of consecutive days worked that split days off were proposed.
Staff felt that split days off did not give them adequate rest
time before starting work again with the possibility of increasing
sickness absence.
top
Staff to Client Ratio
Concerns were raised by some homes about the proposed staffing
ratios. Firstly they felt that there was a risk to jobs particularly
for those on relief or temporary contracts. Many of these people
have worked for many years and consistently up to full time and
feel that they may be without any job at the end of this process,
permanent staff echoed concerns on behalf of their colleagues.
Secondly staff felt in many Homes that there would be a reduction
in the amount of staff available to provide the required support
to an increasingly frail resident population. This issue was equally
an issue for staff providing support to residents approaching
end of life and the increased workload and stress this situation
creates.
top
Skills Mix
There was a belief in all Homes that the increase in the number
of Care Assistants and the reduction of Social Care Officers was
a cause for concern. Staff feel that their posts are being degraded.
That is, the same work will be expected to be done by people on
less money, while the Social Care Officers are concerned for their
futures and livelihoods, unsure if they will have jobs at their
current rate of pay or even jobs at all in the near future.
Relief Staff
With the removal of the title "Relief" staff are concerned if
they will continue to have a job. Many "Reliefs" have worked regularly
for regular hours over a number of years. To them this is their
job. Some homes will be able to appoint permanent staff with the
inclusion of "Relief Staff" onto the rota, others may not be able
to do so. Will 'Relief' Staff' be offered posts? As relief's are
being removed from the staffing model within Care Homes, if they
are unsuccessful in gaining a permanent position, will they be
offered redeployment or redundancy?
The rota's have been drawn up fully staffing the Care Homes,
staff are concerned about what former relief staff will do, how
will their rotas be designed and how will their hours work? Staff
do not want to be left owing hours to the Council.
top
Conclusion
Any change to working practice and patterns causes great concerns
and anxiety. Care Homes are staffed predominantly by a female
workforce that care deeply for their residents home and communities,
but also have home and family lives that are equally important
to them. These proposed changes have unsettled staff and concerns
for themselves and their livelihoods are now forefront in their
minds.
Some staff are "losing" up to 20% of their income due to the
"removal" of shift allowance and this is seen as an insult and
a cut to their wages. Wages they have planned their lives around.
The increase in working weekends for some, equally impacts on
family life, something that is currently planned around existing
rotas.
Staff are not happy about the changes, but most staff are aware
of the difficulties facing the Council. UNISON believes the majority
of staff will feel compelled to accept the changes at their own
personal cost, due to their commitments to the home and the residents.
The staff believe that Aberdeenshire Council is coercing them
into this decision because of their commitments.
Inez Teece Assistant Branch Secretary
UNISON
11th March 2010
top
|